Did YouTube Change Its Algorithm? Why Views May Be Down and What Creators Can Do About It

TL;DR

Many creators are seeing a slowdown in YouTube views and suspect a recent algorithm shift, especially for Shorts. Community data suggests YouTube may now favor newer uploads over older, evergreen content, a pattern some call “the flattening.” While YouTube hasn’t confirmed a change, creators can adapt by focusing on freshness, stronger early engagement, smarter repurposing, and global expansion through localization to unlock new audiences and revenue.

‍

A closer look at creator data, community speculation, and practical ways to adapt

Over the past few weeks, a growing number of YouTube creators have been asking the same question: Why are my views suddenly down? Across X, LinkedIn, Reddit, and private creator groups, people are sharing screenshots of analytics that show a noticeable slowdown. A widely discussed post by Mario Joos sparked a wave of comments from creators who believe YouTube’s recommendation system may have shifted.

There’s no official confirmation from YouTube, but the patterns are consistent enough that they deserve serious attention. Let’s unpack what creators are seeing, what might be changing, and how you can respond.

‍

What Creators Are Observing: The “Flattening” Effect

What kicked off the discussion was a simple but worrying pattern: Shorts that used to keep getting views for weeks or months now seem to drop off sharply after about 28 to 30 days.

Before diving into theories, it’s worth summarizing what many creators are actually reporting in their dashboards and in community threads.

Key observations from creators:

• Shorts older than ~30 days see a steep decline in new impressions.
• New uploads still get initial traction, but long tails are much weaker.
• Even previously evergreen content is no longer resurfacing as often.
• Some creators report similar softness in parts of their long-form back catalog.

Mario Joos described this as “the flattening”: once a Short passes a certain age, its reach levels off dramatically, regardless of past performance. In the LinkedIn discussion, multiple creators echoed the same experience and shared their own data, suggesting this isn’t limited to a single niche or channel size.

This lines up with coverage from industry outlets like Tubefilter, which have reported on creators noticing Shorts performance becoming more dependent on recency rather than sustained engagement.

‍

Has YouTube Confirmed an Algorithm Change?

Short answer: no.

YouTube rarely announces detailed changes to its recommendation systems. Historically, creators only piece things together after seeing patterns across thousands of channels. What YouTube does consistently emphasize in its official documentation is that recommendations are driven by viewer behavior: watch time, satisfaction, and engagement, not by a promise of stable distribution for creators.

As one commenter on LinkedIn put it:

“Platforms optimize for retention, not creator stability. When those priorities shift, years of accumulated view equity can disappear overnight.”

That perspective is important. Even if the algorithm has changed, it likely reflects YouTube optimizing for what keeps viewers watching right now, not for preserving the long-term performance of older uploads.

‍

Why Would YouTube Shift Toward Newer Content?

If this speculation is correct, there are a few plausible reasons.

Before jumping to conclusions, it helps to think about YouTube’s incentives and the broader platform landscape.

Possible drivers behind a shift:

• Viewer freshness - New content may feel more relevant and timely to users.
• Competition with TikTok - TikTok’s feed heavily prioritizes recent, fast-moving content.
• Content volume - With millions of Shorts uploaded daily, YouTube may need stronger decay to manage supply.
• Engagement optimization - Early signals may now matter more than long-term performance.

None of this means evergreen content is “dead.” But it may mean that YouTube is experimenting with how long content stays actively promoted in discovery surfaces.

‍

What This Means for Creators

If older content is indeed being deprioritized, the impact can feel brutal, especially for creators who built predictable traffic from their back catalog.

Still, the situation isn’t hopeless. It just requires adapting how you think about growth.

Here’s what many creators are starting to internalize.

Potential implications:

• Back catalog may no longer guarantee baseline views.
• Publishing cadence and consistency matter more.
• The first hours or days after publishing are even more critical.
• Diversifying formats and surfaces becomes essential.

This doesn’t mean you should panic or flood the platform with low-quality content. But it does suggest that relying purely on evergreen discovery may be riskier than before.

‍

What You Can Do Right Now to Adapt

While you can’t control YouTube’s algorithm, you can control how you respond. The creators who adapt fastest are usually the ones who recover fastest.

Here are practical steps that make sense regardless of whether this specific change is permanent.

Actions to consider:

• Double down on early performance - Optimize hooks, titles, and first seconds to maximize retention.
• Refresh and repurpose - Turn strong older videos into new Shorts, clips, or updated edits.
• Experiment more - Test different formats, lengths, and storytelling styles.
• Track patterns - Compare performance by age of content to see if your channel shows similar flattening.
• Build beyond one surface - Don’t rely on a single format or feed for all your growth.

Most importantly, as this Hootsuite guide on the YouTube algorithm points out, keep making content for humans, not for an imagined version of the algorithm. Long-term audience trust still compounds, even if distribution fluctuates.

‍

Turning a Challenge Into an Opportunity: Go Global

One powerful way to offset slower growth in a single market is to unlock entirely new audiences.

If your channel performs well in its original language, localization can effectively give your content a second life, not by reposting, but by making it native to viewers in other regions.

This is where a partner like Linguana fits naturally into the picture.

Rather than just dubbing videos, Linguana helps creators:

• Launch separate language channels for each market.
• Localize audio, thumbnails, titles, and descriptions.
• Preserve the creator’s voice with high-quality AI dubbing plus human review.
• Monetize new audiences quickly on a revenue-share model with no upfront cost.

For creators seeing slower growth in their primary market, expanding globally can restore momentum and diversify revenue without needing to produce new content from scratch.

In a world where algorithms shift, owning multiple growth engines across languages is a powerful hedge.

‍

Community Insight Matters More Than Ever

One of the most valuable aspects of this entire discussion is not whether the theory is 100 percent correct, but that creators are openly sharing data and patterns.

The LinkedIn thread around Mario Joos’s post turned into a mini roundtable of analysts, strategists, and operators comparing notes. That collective intelligence is often how the creator ecosystem adapts faster than any single channel could alone.

If there’s one takeaway here, it’s this: pay attention to your peers, not just your dashboard.

‍

Final Thought

YouTube has always evolved. From watch time to Shorts to multi-format feeds, creators have had to adapt again and again. This moment feels no different.

If views are down, it doesn’t mean your content suddenly got worse. It may mean the system around it changed.

The creators who win long term will be the ones who:

• Stay calm.
• Learn fast.
• Experiment smart.
• And build audiences that extend beyond a single feed, format, or language.

Algorithm shifts come and go. Strong creator brands endure.

‍

FAQ

1. Did YouTube officially change its algorithm?
YouTube has not confirmed any specific change. The discussion is based on creator data and observed patterns.

‍

2. What is “the flattening”?
It refers to Shorts seeing a sharp drop in views after about 28 to 30 days, regardless of past performance.

‍

3. Is this only affecting Shorts?
Mostly Shorts, but some creators report softness in older long-form content too.

‍

4. Should I post more often now?
Consistency helps, but quality still matters. Focus on strong early engagement rather than just volume.

‍

5. Is evergreen content no longer valuable?
It’s still valuable for audiences, but it may not get the same long-term algorithmic boost as before.

‍

6. How can localization help if views are down?
It opens new markets. Your content can grow again by reaching viewers in other languages who have never seen it before.

‍

7. Is AI dubbing enough to go global?
High-quality localization also needs cultural nuance, metadata, thumbnails, and channel strategy, not just translated audio.

‍

8. When does Linguana make sense?
For creators with strong performance in their original language who want fast, zero-effort global expansion and monetization.